Is ther any REAL difference? I see they are grouped together as to burn rate. Hodgdon groups theirs with their Extreme powders so I'd lean that way.
Load data interchangeable?
IMR4895 vs H4895
IMR4895 vs H4895
Sako VLSS Set Trigger in .204 with Leupold VXIII 4.5-14x50 LR
Sako VLSS Set Trigger in 22-250 with Swaro Z5 5-25x52 BRX and turret
Sako Stainless Synth in .260 with Swaro Z5 3.5-18x44 BRX
Ruger MKIII 678GC with Ultradot Matchdot
Sako VLSS Set Trigger in 22-250 with Swaro Z5 5-25x52 BRX and turret
Sako Stainless Synth in .260 with Swaro Z5 3.5-18x44 BRX
Ruger MKIII 678GC with Ultradot Matchdot
- ACLakey
- Senior Member
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:06 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savage .204 Predator Hunter(soon)
- Location: So. Oregon
Re: IMR4895 vs H4895
From my experience, no the H4895 has been a little hotter.
- Sidewinderwa
- Senior Member
- Posts: 648
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:39 am
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savages
- Location: Washington state
Re: IMR4895 vs H4895
I shoot the H4895 because it is a temperature insensitive powder. Most of the shooters use the H over the IMR, that I have seen.
Please, no Sidewinder today!