Federal's 204 trajectory data

Share information about reloading the 204 Ruger.
User avatar
bow shot
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:04 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Rock River Arms AR-15 Varminter
Location: Central NY: infested with liberal wack-jobs and their damage

Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by bow shot »

So I was looking at Federal's 204 ammo data, and it show that their ammo loaded with 39gn sierra SBKs has a much flatter trajectory than their ammo loaded with 32gn speer bullets, and is a tad flatter than the Nosler 32's.

Any thoughts? Is this a boo-boo in their data, or is it perhaps that the 39 SBK's have a much better BC??
User avatar
RoadKill
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Rem. 700VLS and 23" G2 barrel on older Contender
Location: Caswell County bush in NC

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by RoadKill »

I never totally trust the drop data as listed on ammo boxes. My real world results too often differ.
User avatar
bow shot
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:04 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Rock River Arms AR-15 Varminter
Location: Central NY: infested with liberal wack-jobs and their damage

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by bow shot »

I got the data from the ammmo selector on their web site... which I'm sure is the same as what is on the boxes. Nice graphics anyway.
User avatar
bow shot
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:04 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Rock River Arms AR-15 Varminter
Location: Central NY: infested with liberal wack-jobs and their damage

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by bow shot »

Here's the graph. The SBK is in blue and the other two colors are the Nosler and Speer 32's. I'd say 15" drop over 500y is pretty huge, especially since the SBK is the heaviest bullet...

[img]http://i906.photobucket.com/albums ... .jpg[/img]
Kale_M
New Member
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:00 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Rem 700 VTR

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by Kale_M »

i am preety sure it is due to the higher B.C of the 39gr SBK
Fred_C_Dobbs
Senior Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:13 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Savage 12 Varminter Low Profile

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by Fred_C_Dobbs »

Bryan Litz addresses this in his book on long range ballistics. The lighter/lower BC bullet ordinarily will shoot flatter at the shorter ranges but, at longer ranges, due to its higher BC, sometimes -- and I emphasize sometimes -- at extended ranges the heavier bullet will have the flatter trajectory because the lighter bullet has begun to slow so rapidly.

That doesn't prove that Federal's data is right, just that it's not impossible. And .204 bullets are so light in general, it makes sense the lightest .204 projectiles would experience this.

(rapid slowing, is that an oxymoron, ...like pretty ugly?)
User avatar
bow shot
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:04 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Rock River Arms AR-15 Varminter
Location: Central NY: infested with liberal wack-jobs and their damage

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by bow shot »

Now then... understood!
User avatar
ryutzy
Senior Member
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:40 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Superior Arms Custom AR-15 Leopold VXIII 4.5-14X50
Location: Plain City, OH

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by ryutzy »

+1 what fred said. In fact I have not seen any ballistics chart showing that any bullet lighter than the 39SBK being flatter shooting. Every rifle caliber has an "optimum" bullet weight/BC for the flattest shooting in a given range. Put it like this..........if you had a ping pong ball that was exactly the same size as a golf ball and you tried to throw them both as far as you could, which would go farther? Of course the golf ball---it's weight will keep it going but the ping pong ball will fall off drastically due to it's low BC (or weight).
It's hard to detect good luck, It looks so much like something you've worked hard for and earned.
Stay humble, Stay teacheable
User avatar
bow shot
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:04 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Rock River Arms AR-15 Varminter
Location: Central NY: infested with liberal wack-jobs and their damage

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by bow shot »

makes sense...
Bill K
Senior Member
Posts: 2324
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:00 am
.204 Ruger Guns: also now, a Savage switch bull barrel in 204R. 23 inch SS
Location: Lake Forest, Ca.

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by Bill K »

RoadKill wrote:I never totally trust the drop data as listed on ammo boxes. My real world results too often differ.
The drop data shown by the companies, of course, is with their test and rifle. The only way to know what your rifle/weapon is doing, is to test your weapon and the ammo/bullet. Varibles are always there. i.e. scope mounting, barrel hamonics, etc. your load and bullet may be way different. Have fun and go make your own drop tests. Bill K :)
User avatar
bow shot
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:04 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Rock River Arms AR-15 Varminter
Location: Central NY: infested with liberal wack-jobs and their damage

Re: Federal's 204 trajectory data

Post by bow shot »

That I do!
Image
Post Reply