Interpreting Groups
Interpreting Groups
Hi All,
I just finished putting together my AR in .204 and I'm ready to start load development. In the past I've shot 5 different charge weights and taken the best group and used it since I'm happy with 3/4" groups for a big game rifle. But for a prairie dog rifle, I'd like to get more precise, so I would like your expertise. Here is my question:
When you are shooting groups, how do you interpret the results? I've read that for vertical strings, increase charge weight or COAL and for horizontal strings do the opposite. Are they any other rules of thumb that you guys use? What about groups that aren’t clearly stringing? How about groups that form two very tiny clusters, but each cluster is about 1" apart? I'm just trying to learn more about how to take a decent group and make it much smaller, so any advise you guys can give would be great.
I just finished putting together my AR in .204 and I'm ready to start load development. In the past I've shot 5 different charge weights and taken the best group and used it since I'm happy with 3/4" groups for a big game rifle. But for a prairie dog rifle, I'd like to get more precise, so I would like your expertise. Here is my question:
When you are shooting groups, how do you interpret the results? I've read that for vertical strings, increase charge weight or COAL and for horizontal strings do the opposite. Are they any other rules of thumb that you guys use? What about groups that aren’t clearly stringing? How about groups that form two very tiny clusters, but each cluster is about 1" apart? I'm just trying to learn more about how to take a decent group and make it much smaller, so any advise you guys can give would be great.
- Vartarg
- Senior Member
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:26 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Ruger 77MkII Target, Remington LVSF
- Location: Louisiana
Re: Interpreting Groups
I'm going to wait for some our more learned members to chime in to respond to your question, so I'll simply say WELCOME to the forum....you've come to the right place!
PEACE-Through Superior Firepower
- fishy
- Junior Member
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:37 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Ruger M77 Hawkeye
- Location: Central Nebraska
Re: Interpreting Groups
I'm interested as well in the answer. Thats a good question. Also welcome to the forum.
- Hotshot
- Senior Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:32 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savage and ar-15
- Location: Rapid City
- Contact:
Re: Interpreting Groups
I read somewhere not too long ago, if your group is Vertical that's bedding and if it's Horizontal that's the shooter. Thinking back over the years there just might be something to that. Or was it the other way around?
Rule of thumb for a 204Ruger: If it won't shoot 39gr Sierras with a close to max charge of R10X, Benchmark, 4895, or 8208--Trade it off for another one, because most will shoot that load real well.
Rule of thumb for a 204Ruger: If it won't shoot 39gr Sierras with a close to max charge of R10X, Benchmark, 4895, or 8208--Trade it off for another one, because most will shoot that load real well.
- 7mag
- New Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:15 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Rem 7, Zeiss 4.5-14x44-Rem 700, Zeiss 6.5-20x50-Cooper Pheon
- Location: North west North Dakota
Re: Interpreting Groups
So far WN Mag and I have been lucky, All 3 of the 204's we shoot are sub moa with all the loads we try. Some being one hole loads. The wife loves the fact that she's taking "Tack Drivers-ed" in a Ferrari. Ya' gotta love the violent little 204! If anyone knows for sure how to interpret groups I would love to know more. I will do some testing on the theories here and see if I can figure anything out. Really great question!!
Leave nothing in the field but your tracks.........(and a few carcasses!)
- Rick in Oregon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4942
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:20 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Sako 75V, Cooper MTV, Kimber 84M, Cust M700 11 Twist
- Location: High Desert of Central Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Interpreting Groups
In the recent past, Precision Shooting had an entire article on that very subject. I also remember seeing a piece in Varmint Hunter Magazine a while back. There's been more than one article in VHM over the years about this, and more than one method of measurement.
- Glen
- Moderator
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:22 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Rem700ADL
- Location: New Philadelphia, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: Interpreting Groups
My interpretation.
Vertical-- Shots fired too quickly & the next round lays in a hotter chamber than the previous & cooks. More pressure = higher velocity can raise POI. Poor front rest technique can also be a culprit. The rifle needs to rest the same way every time.
Horizontal-- Wind drift. Hard trigger pull. Shooter not lining up the same way every time. Again poor front rest technique & the rifle is moving on recoil.
Scattered-- A combination of the above plus parallax issue. Seating depth,charge weight,primers, & a whole host of things can cause scatter. Change 1 thing only at a time & keep strict records.
Merely my thoughts on the subject.
Vertical-- Shots fired too quickly & the next round lays in a hotter chamber than the previous & cooks. More pressure = higher velocity can raise POI. Poor front rest technique can also be a culprit. The rifle needs to rest the same way every time.
Horizontal-- Wind drift. Hard trigger pull. Shooter not lining up the same way every time. Again poor front rest technique & the rifle is moving on recoil.
Scattered-- A combination of the above plus parallax issue. Seating depth,charge weight,primers, & a whole host of things can cause scatter. Change 1 thing only at a time & keep strict records.
Merely my thoughts on the subject.
Friends Are Friends By Nature.
RIP Russ,Blaine, & Darrell!!
I don't like repeat offenders. I like DEAD offenders!!
Ted Nugent
Isn't there a minimum age for grampas??
^^^^^^
Audrey Renae told me "No there isn't"!!
Glen
RIP Russ,Blaine, & Darrell!!
I don't like repeat offenders. I like DEAD offenders!!
Ted Nugent
Isn't there a minimum age for grampas??
^^^^^^
Audrey Renae told me "No there isn't"!!
Glen
Re: Interpreting Groups
Thanks Guys, there is some excellent advise there! I was so focused on charge weight and bullet depth that I wasnt even thinking about front rest or parallax issues.
Nobody happens to remember the conclusions from the article in Varmint Hunter Mag do they? Maybe I need to get a subscription...
Does anybody else have any good ideas?
Nobody happens to remember the conclusions from the article in Varmint Hunter Mag do they? Maybe I need to get a subscription...
Does anybody else have any good ideas?
Re: Interpreting Groups
So many answers to this question not sure anyone can give a direct answer most of my bench shooting is with bolt rifles with heavy barrel, various patterns are the result of scope,front rest, stock bedding, trigger, bullet weight, powder charge, etc. All this with bolt action but even more variables with auto's. Barrel harmonics with a slim barrel can also be an issue. Also have a friend try the gun with same loads to get their results.
Fun is in the process.
Fun is in the process.
Re: Interpreting Groups
A goodly amount of the variations are shooter error. If I am not patient in my setup, I can get either horizontals and/or verticals. Seems like after I have been getting quite a bit of trigger time, my techniques get better and then the groups shrink.
I think if you nose around on SniperHide(just google) there are posts that address the issues of horizontal and vertical groups. Some are also loads that cause vertical stringing. I can't speak for anyone else, but having the crosshairs on the target without my holding the gun is an excellent starting point.
I think if you nose around on SniperHide(just google) there are posts that address the issues of horizontal and vertical groups. Some are also loads that cause vertical stringing. I can't speak for anyone else, but having the crosshairs on the target without my holding the gun is an excellent starting point.