Wolf: What Glenn said. I could not agree more in every regard...good advice all the way through.
I've done the "more is better" thing long ago, and have come back to the basics, and feel the old '06 just does it all, and does it all very well indeed. I have friends who hunt the world, and that's their caliber of choice, and we're talking BC, Alaska, and Africa here.
For what you want, either the '06 or .270 would fit the bill nicely, even the 7-08. I have a custom Titanium 7mm-08 Ackley that shoot flat, is light (6.5 lbs scoped), and with a Barnes 120 or 130 gr TSX, will give full penetration on large bull elk. How much more could a guy ask for?
The right bullet and shot placement is more important than caliber, and you don't need a magnum for any game that walks the lower 48, period.
You wanted some pictures, so here's some for you: Bull elk taken with my M70 in .338-06 Ackley. Texas heart shot, all I had was his orange rump to look at, Nosler 210 Partition entered just east of the poop chute, broke the large hip joint, traveled all the way to the other front shoulder, broke it and exited. Not bad performance; almost 5' of elk penetration from the '06 case (no magnum).
Another bull, taken with same rifle:
Mulies, all taken with '06's and .270's:
Another mulie, .270 & 130gr.:
I could go on, but you get the idea; magnumitis is a myth, you don't need them. More blast, more recoil, longer barrel to get in the way, heavier rifle, less rounds in the magazine, more expensive to shoot, and just not as much fun to shoot, meaning you'll practice less, and not shoot them as well. Out of all the guys I know who hunt seriously, not a single one shoots a magnum. I own a sweet .330 Dakota on a M98 action, Shilen barrel, select Black English walnut that shoots less than MOA, but in truth, I've never even hunted it! Go figure.
Advice is free, and you'll get alot of it, but you asked, and that's what I'd recommend. Good luck with the quest, hope you like what you end up with and shoot it well.
