Beanfield Coyotes With .204?
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:33 pm
Wondering if the 20 calibers - as much as I love 'em - have enough a-- to kill a coyote after poking through a few rows of soybean leaves. I've shot woodchucks through bean leaves over the years but not through these waist-high bushes we see here now, thanks to heavy rains that are all too common around here now.
Yesterday, while groundhog hunting I was able to get of a shot at a running 'yote around 100 yards out in a high beanfield; the only body parts of him showing were his head and top few inches of his back. Kind of like a submariner watching a torpedo head towards its target (but in fast-motion), thanks to the low-recoil .204 and luckily no flinch on my part, I could actually trace the bullet's path by its wake through the leaves as it made what seemed like a broadside hit. Sounded good, too, and I scanned the field for him to re-surface; he never did, but that didn't mean he didn't just lower his head and hit the afterburners if I'd missed or slunk out of the area under the leaf canopy if wounded.
At any rate, after tip-toeing through hundreds of square feet of thick beans looking for a carcass, I gave up and chalked it up to either a flat-out miss or a low-energy hit that probably didn't have a chance of killing in the first place. I'll wait a couple days in case there's a body that starts stinking, but from now on if on a dedicated coyote hunt in/around crops I'll probably be taking my .243 or build a fast-twist heavy bullet .22-250 or Swift.
Later, I set up a cardboard target at the same distance and shot it through several rows. Surprisingly, there seemed to be little deflection, although one of three bullets hit sideways. Can't speculate on energy delivered, though. Also, I'm in no way endorsing shooting through vegetation that might cause ricochets or taking shots at partially obscured targets one is not sure of.
Yesterday, while groundhog hunting I was able to get of a shot at a running 'yote around 100 yards out in a high beanfield; the only body parts of him showing were his head and top few inches of his back. Kind of like a submariner watching a torpedo head towards its target (but in fast-motion), thanks to the low-recoil .204 and luckily no flinch on my part, I could actually trace the bullet's path by its wake through the leaves as it made what seemed like a broadside hit. Sounded good, too, and I scanned the field for him to re-surface; he never did, but that didn't mean he didn't just lower his head and hit the afterburners if I'd missed or slunk out of the area under the leaf canopy if wounded.
At any rate, after tip-toeing through hundreds of square feet of thick beans looking for a carcass, I gave up and chalked it up to either a flat-out miss or a low-energy hit that probably didn't have a chance of killing in the first place. I'll wait a couple days in case there's a body that starts stinking, but from now on if on a dedicated coyote hunt in/around crops I'll probably be taking my .243 or build a fast-twist heavy bullet .22-250 or Swift.
Later, I set up a cardboard target at the same distance and shot it through several rows. Surprisingly, there seemed to be little deflection, although one of three bullets hit sideways. Can't speculate on energy delivered, though. Also, I'm in no way endorsing shooting through vegetation that might cause ricochets or taking shots at partially obscured targets one is not sure of.