TrailBoss
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:10 pm
I recently grabbed a bottle of ADI TrailBoss (pretty sure it's the same as IMR TB) to work up some reduced loads for plinking and bunny shooting.
Filled a case with TB to where I've been loading BM2 at 28.7gn behind the 26VGs, and the TB weighed in at 9.7 grains!
Loaded 3 each (just over a week ago) at 0.2 intervals from 8.0 up to 9.8 and tested them at 50yds. Accuracy was pretty poor (best was 0.8" - remember 50yds) and most were 1.5-2" And plenty of evidence (about 90% keyholed) to suggest they weren't flying straight (off axis).
Also, the 2 lower charges gave around 2400fps, then everything above 28.4gn gave about 2500fps. 29.8gn still gave 2500.
So today I loaded a few more at the lower end from 6.8-7.7 - best group 3", worst >5" Don't reckon I can settle for 10moa.
Thing is - the first loads were at 2.266" OAL, and for some stupid reason I ASSUMED I was seating at 2.262" so that's where the last loads ended up (been at sea for a week between loads - lesson learned - ALWAYS check data).
Seems clear enough evidence, even though they were different charges, that small seating depth changes can make big differences.
Before I put this powder to the back of the safe and forget about it, I'd like a few opinions.
I know the obvious alternative is to buy a .22lr, (or .17hmr for similar speeds), but convincing the finance minister is an issue there. Besides, there's a bit of the 'taming the beast' feeling of accomplishment hovering around this if I can get a good consistent group.
-The OAL for the 26VG touching the lands in my rifle is 2.275" so the first loads are 9 thou off.
-Obviously seating deeper isn't working, and although working closer to the lands MAY shrink the groups, is it likely to stabilize the bullet any better? Or is it simply a matter of RPM (bullets built for higher speed) and they won't stabilize at lower velocity?
***I have contacted ADI and received confirmation that it is safe to use this powder in .204
It isn't listed in their .204 data, but they sent instructions on how to safely work up a load.
Filled a case with TB to where I've been loading BM2 at 28.7gn behind the 26VGs, and the TB weighed in at 9.7 grains!
Loaded 3 each (just over a week ago) at 0.2 intervals from 8.0 up to 9.8 and tested them at 50yds. Accuracy was pretty poor (best was 0.8" - remember 50yds) and most were 1.5-2" And plenty of evidence (about 90% keyholed) to suggest they weren't flying straight (off axis).
Also, the 2 lower charges gave around 2400fps, then everything above 28.4gn gave about 2500fps. 29.8gn still gave 2500.
So today I loaded a few more at the lower end from 6.8-7.7 - best group 3", worst >5" Don't reckon I can settle for 10moa.
Thing is - the first loads were at 2.266" OAL, and for some stupid reason I ASSUMED I was seating at 2.262" so that's where the last loads ended up (been at sea for a week between loads - lesson learned - ALWAYS check data).
Seems clear enough evidence, even though they were different charges, that small seating depth changes can make big differences.
Before I put this powder to the back of the safe and forget about it, I'd like a few opinions.
I know the obvious alternative is to buy a .22lr, (or .17hmr for similar speeds), but convincing the finance minister is an issue there. Besides, there's a bit of the 'taming the beast' feeling of accomplishment hovering around this if I can get a good consistent group.
-The OAL for the 26VG touching the lands in my rifle is 2.275" so the first loads are 9 thou off.
-Obviously seating deeper isn't working, and although working closer to the lands MAY shrink the groups, is it likely to stabilize the bullet any better? Or is it simply a matter of RPM (bullets built for higher speed) and they won't stabilize at lower velocity?
***I have contacted ADI and received confirmation that it is safe to use this powder in .204
It isn't listed in their .204 data, but they sent instructions on how to safely work up a load.