Page 1 of 1

IMR 4895 vs H4895

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:45 pm
by fredbeer
I have about 4 lbs of IMR 4895 that was bought several years ago loading for my Garand. How does this compare to H 4895 loading for .204 Ruger? They seem very close according to the data I've seen on the 204. Anyone found a good load using IMR 4895?

Re: IMR 4895 vs H4895

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:56 pm
by Verminator2
Yep!! I haven't tried H4895 yet, as I had IMR 4895 and I didn't see the need to change :D
39 SBK
27.3 gr. of IMR 4895
Fed. 205M
WW cases
Image

Re: IMR 4895 vs H4895

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:00 pm
by Tic-Tac
verminator2,
What's your OAL? Nice shooting.

Re: IMR 4895 vs H4895

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:09 pm
by Verminator2
Thanks, COAL is 2.250

Re: IMR 4895 vs H4895

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:39 am
by Savage250
Nice group! I need to find a recipe for H4895 and the 39SBK's. Anybody know where I might find one?? I've got Hodgdon's book but it doesn't show anything for the 39's in 204.

Thanks,

Re: IMR 4895 vs H4895

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:02 pm
by WrzWaldo
Savage250 wrote:Nice group! I need to find a recipe for H4895 and the 39SBK's. Anybody know where I might find one?? I've got Hodgdon's book but it doesn't show anything for the 39's in 204.

Thanks,
Yepper, right here...

And a couple here also.

Re: IMR 4895 vs H4895

Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:43 pm
by Savage250
Thanks Waldo. Very good info...just what I was lookin for.