32 gr blitz king
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:02 pm
looking for a accurate handload using the sierra 32 blitzking and benchmark powder. thanks
That is funny. I took my old muzzle loader out the other day. I haven't shot it since the end of last September. I have only been shooting my .204 all winter and man...talk about slow. It seemed like it took that old slug forever to get the the target compared to the .204. I guess I just started to take 3900 fps for granted.WHISTLEPIG wrote:Funny how we think of 3950 as slow.
NHS - how true. But, answer this, if you had to pic, which round would you want to be accidently hit with?NHS wrote:That is funny. I took my old muzzle loader out the other day. I haven't shot it since the end of last September. I have only been shooting my .204 all winter and man...talk about slow. It seemed like it took that old slug forever to get the the target compared to the .204. I guess I just started to take 3900 fps for granted.WHISTLEPIG wrote:Funny how we think of 3950 as slow.
NHS
Code: Select all
[IMG]http://www.blabla.jpg[/IMG]
I guess if I had to choose, I'd take my chances with a blistering fast 32 grainer over a 375 gr maxiball going 1400 fps. You know that sucker is going to penetrate no matter where it hits you!acloco wrote:NHS - how true. But, answer this, if you had to pic, which round would you want to be accidently hit with?NHS wrote:That is funny. I took my old muzzle loader out the other day. I haven't shot it since the end of last September. I have only been shooting my .204 all winter and man...talk about slow. It seemed like it took that old slug forever to get the the target compared to the .204. I guess I just started to take 3900 fps for granted.WHISTLEPIG wrote:Funny how we think of 3950 as slow.
NHS
"I will take the 204 in the arm for $50 Alex."
"Excellent choice, that leaves the .54 caliber in the torso for $100 to finish out that category".