32 gr blitz king
32 gr blitz king
looking for a accurate handload using the sierra 32 blitzking and benchmark powder. thanks
- Keith in Ga
- Senior Member
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:39 pm
- Location: north Ga
- glenn asher
- Senior Member
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:25 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savage 12fvss, CZ 527 American
- Location: kentucky
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 8:09 am
- Location: s. w. Idaho
That is funny. I took my old muzzle loader out the other day. I haven't shot it since the end of last September. I have only been shooting my .204 all winter and man...talk about slow. It seemed like it took that old slug forever to get the the target compared to the .204. I guess I just started to take 3900 fps for granted.WHISTLEPIG wrote:Funny how we think of 3950 as slow.
NHS
![Image](http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y99/NHS33/readin2.jpg)
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:53 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: 12FV, 12BVSS -S
- Location: Nebraska
NHS - how true. But, answer this, if you had to pic, which round would you want to be accidently hit with?NHS wrote:That is funny. I took my old muzzle loader out the other day. I haven't shot it since the end of last September. I have only been shooting my .204 all winter and man...talk about slow. It seemed like it took that old slug forever to get the the target compared to the .204. I guess I just started to take 3900 fps for granted.WHISTLEPIG wrote:Funny how we think of 3950 as slow.
NHS
"I will take the 204 in the arm for $50 Alex."
"Excellent choice, that leaves the .54 caliber in the torso for $100 to finish out that category".
39 grain BK
I reported my success the other day so I thought I'd back it up with a target photo. All groups are at 100 yards, groups 1 and 2 are before I adjusted for POI change. Group 3, I adjusted windage and 4 I adjusted elevation to get where I want to be at 100 yards.
Load is 26.5 of H4895 with Sierra 39 grain BK
![Image](http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-11/1228432/204Target1-2007.jpg)
Load is 26.5 of H4895 with Sierra 39 grain BK
![Image](http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-11/1228432/204Target1-2007.jpg)
Last edited by janneuf on Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
janneuf
Use IMG tags around the direct URL -
Code: Select all
[IMG]http://www.blabla.jpg[/IMG]
acloco wrote:NHS - how true. But, answer this, if you had to pic, which round would you want to be accidently hit with?NHS wrote:That is funny. I took my old muzzle loader out the other day. I haven't shot it since the end of last September. I have only been shooting my .204 all winter and man...talk about slow. It seemed like it took that old slug forever to get the the target compared to the .204. I guess I just started to take 3900 fps for granted.WHISTLEPIG wrote:Funny how we think of 3950 as slow.
NHS
"I will take the 204 in the arm for $50 Alex."
"Excellent choice, that leaves the .54 caliber in the torso for $100 to finish out that category".
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
I'll take the category:
"Do everything possible to prevent accidental shootings for $1000"
NHS
Last edited by NHS on Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
![Image](http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y99/NHS33/readin2.jpg)
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it.