Remington 700 adl

a325wsm · Post by **a325wsm** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:14 pm

Does any body have one and what is your opinion on them and yes it is in 204 ruger?

Glen · Post by **Glen** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:36 pm

I have one. It does the trick on groundhogs for sure!!

Same day but a different location on the same farm. The farmer watched me hammer em both!!

I did put a Richards Micro-Fit T-hole stock on mine. Maple with rosewood cap & tip. It helped load development tremendously by stabilizing the rifle on the front bag much better. I had the trigger set from a couple tons down to 2 1/2lbs & added a 6-18 VXII to the mix. It likes the 32gr V-Max very very much but not the 40's. Your rifle may like the 40's. It enjoys the 40gr Bergers just as much as the 32's but the 39gr BlitzKings run 3/4" at 200yds.

That is my load of choice for everything except coyotes. I still have a few 40gr Bergers loaded & when they are gone it will be the 39gr BK's til death do us part!!

HTH

acloco · Post by **acloco** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:25 pm

Glen - THAT is a nice looking stick!

SuperSeal110 · Post by **SuperSeal110** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:47 am

I bought an ADL .204. I just replaced the laminated stock and switched scopes. Currently wears a HS stock and an Leupold 3.5-10 LR/T w/md.

I have around $700 into the gun and optics.

Only ammo I've tried was 34gr Dogtown bullets. Shoots 3/4-1" consistent. Not a bench gun by any means. I occasionally get 1/2" group here and there. I'm trying to decide to keep it a .204 or get her rebarrel in .17 rem and build a .204 upper for the AR....

Here's what she's done...

PD out West

Currently what she looks like.

Glen · Post by **Glen** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:21 am

Thanks acloco!! And only $160!!

SuperSeal110-- I'm wondering why you switched stocks? I like that lam stock you had on there. If mine woulda came with that one I probably wouldn't have changed it. Just wondering.

Still a nice lookin rig either way!!

jo191145 · Post by **jo191145** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:22 pm

superseal

Thats not half bad accuracy for the 34 DT's. They're not noted for thier match quality accuracy.
They sure chewed up the younguns though.

ROTAXPOWER · Post by **ROTAXPOWER** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:50 pm

I cant seem to get my ADL to shoot worth the sh-ts... I dont know what the deal is with it.

SuperSeal110 · Post by **SuperSeal110** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:43 am

Glen,

The laminated stock was heavy. I wasn't too crazy about the color, too. I have a couple guns with gray laminated stock and brown laminated stocks that I like. This laminated stock wasn't my flavor.

jo191145, I've read a lot of reviews on Midwayusa saying people are getting great accuracy with them. I bought them because they were CHEAP and I needed a lot of PD out west.

Vartarg · Post by **Vartarg** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:22 am

What stock is that on the rifle now?? Looks sharp!

Glen · Post by **Glen** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:41 pm

Just curious SS110. I like that stock color myself. And I have a couple lams on rimfires & they certainly are heavy.

willyp19 · Post by **willyp19** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:33 am

I have one, and it shoots Sierra 32 gr. BK and Berger 35 gr HPs super accurately.

SmallCaliberCentral

Remington 700 adl

Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl

Re: Remington 700 adl