SmallCaliberCentral

Has any one had any experience using a muzzle brake with the 204. I have been thinking of putting one on one of my savages. I find anything much higher than 10 to 12 power and visual impact is sacrificed through the scope. Any feedback would be appreciated.

Gube: I can't explain why you can't see your hits using a 204 with 10 - 12X magnification, as I shoot mine using a Lupy 6.5-20X, and even on 20X, I can see the hits/misses with no problem whatever.

Not knowing more about your shooting style, I'd say that it's possibly due to how you have your rifle set up during the shot. Almost all my varmint and paper shooting is done from a bench, and sometimes in the field from a bipod. No problem seeing hits using either method. From the bench, I use a front rest and a rear bag, and in the field off the bipod, I usually use a small dog-gone-good stock toe bag to support the toe of the stock.

Are you shooting a varmint weight rifle or a light sporter? Rifle weight comes into play here, and if a sporter, then I understand your plight. The only rifle I use a brake on is my 243 Ackley Improved bench rifle, and with it, seeing hits on 20X out to 800 yards is not problem (Holland Quick-Discharge Brake).

Brakes have their advantages and disadvantages, and for me at least, a 204 is not a candidate for a muzzle brake. But that's just me.

i have a muzzle brake on my tac 20 and makes a lot of differance from shooting my 204 which has minimal recoil also
but very loud !