.204 Dead Dog
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:03 am
Has anyone heard of this cartridge? I'm curious.
http://www.reloadersnest.com/frontpage. ... iberID=521
http://www.reloadersnest.com/frontpage. ... iberID=521
I don't recall seeing it in my version of “Cartridges of the Worldâ€Â! But I will have another look see when I get home this evening.This text is based on information from “Cartridges of the Worldâ€Â, Hodgdon reloading manual, the cartridge designer and/or own resources.
Must of had a bent rifle...My biggest disappointment with the .204 Ruger was that it was not very accurate past 300yds. Any Prairie dogs that were 350yds away were actually fairly safe when I was shooting that rifle.
Kinda what I thought. Then he tried 50 gr bullets.WrzWaldo wrote:Must of had a bent rifle...My biggest disappointment with the .204 Ruger was that it was not very accurate past 300yds. Any Prairie dogs that were 350yds away were actually fairly safe when I was shooting that rifle.
I think it goes back to the 204 prejustice. http://rugerhunting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3730Rick in Oregon wrote:It all seems confusing to me. I've had spectacular kills on large ground squirrels in excess of 465 yards with Sierra 32gr Blitz Kings. From the reaction of the squirrel (can you say "launch"?), I'd say there was plenty of 'steam' left, even past this mythical 300 yard marker.......
Ask anyone with at least one full season behind a 204 Ruger, and their enthusiam usually speaks for itself.
I discussed this stuff with Thad Becker back when he was shooting the 204. I do not remember any posts about a Savage 204. He was shooting a Cooper 204 with the 50 Bergs. As I rember it the Cooper was giving .25moa at 200yds and .5 moa out to 500yds with the 50's. At 600yds they suddenly dropped an extra 6'' over the ballistic program table and 6'' to the left (or right). This was his major upset with the 204 and the data he was looking for to condemn it.Bergcrane2 wrote:Kinda what I thought. Then he tried 50 gr bullets.WrzWaldo wrote:Must of had a bent rifle...My biggest disappointment with the .204 Ruger was that it was not very accurate past 300yds. Any Prairie dogs that were 350yds away were actually fairly safe when I was shooting that rifle.
well not sure how i'm going to explain to my 16yo son that his .204 wasn't capable of killin praire dogs out to 400yds, not sure why those pds exploded when he squeezed off a round, but it couldn't have been the 32gr v-maxs he was sending down range! after all some self proclaimed expert says a .204 ain't good past 300yds, well I'll just break it to him gentle like, that what he was doin was impossible!Bergcrane2 wrote:Kinda what I thought. Then he tried 50 gr bullets.WrzWaldo wrote:Must of had a bent rifle...My biggest disappointment with the .204 Ruger was that it was not very accurate past 300yds. Any Prairie dogs that were 350yds away were actually fairly safe when I was shooting that rifle.