Barrel length
- Flatliner
- New Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:35 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: none
- Location: Northern Ireland
Barrel length
Hi guys....................
What would you say is the optimum barrel length for a 204?
What would you say is the optimum barrel length for a 204?
- Rick in Oregon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4942
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:20 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Sako 75V, Cooper MTV, Kimber 84M, Cust M700 11 Twist
- Location: High Desert of Central Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Barrel length
All four of my 204's along with my 20VT all wear 24" barrels. Matter of fact, ALL my varmint rifles wear that length, as I find that particular length the best (IMO) for the combination of handling in the field, on the bench and velocity. Anything longer gets too muzzle heavy and clunky, shorter gives too much blast and velocity loss, but it's purty subjective at best.
You may find this piece interesting to make your decision:
http://www.bullberry.com/204_ruger_velocities.html
You may find this piece interesting to make your decision:
http://www.bullberry.com/204_ruger_velocities.html
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:19 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savage 12 BTCSS
Re: Barrel length
My wife shoots a 26" and all mine are 24". I take hers out of the case and put it on the bench. I take hers off the bench and put it in the case. You get the picture. I took hers on a p-dog hunt this past summer and found it a bit cumbersome for walking around. However, I do like shooting it off the bench. If I had to pick one, I'd stay with the 24" but if you want a "truck" gun, maybe even a 22".
- Flatliner
- New Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:35 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: none
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: Barrel length
Thanks lads.
At the minute, Howa 1500 seems to the best value for money over here, and so it's a choice of a 20" heavy, 22" sporter or a 24" heavy. As most of my shooting is done on foot, plus the fact that I want to add a moderator, means I'll probably go for the 22". I know the figures for Hornady factory ammo are from a 26" barrel, just wondering how much of an impact the shorter barrel will have on velocities?
At the minute, Howa 1500 seems to the best value for money over here, and so it's a choice of a 20" heavy, 22" sporter or a 24" heavy. As most of my shooting is done on foot, plus the fact that I want to add a moderator, means I'll probably go for the 22". I know the figures for Hornady factory ammo are from a 26" barrel, just wondering how much of an impact the shorter barrel will have on velocities?
- Rick in Oregon
- Moderator
- Posts: 4942
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:20 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Sako 75V, Cooper MTV, Kimber 84M, Cust M700 11 Twist
- Location: High Desert of Central Oregon
- Contact:
Re: Barrel length
Flatliner: This may help answer your 204 barrel length/velocity question:
http://www.bullberry.com/204_ruger_velocities.html
HTH
http://www.bullberry.com/204_ruger_velocities.html
HTH
- Hotshot
- Senior Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:32 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savage and ar-15
- Location: Rapid City
- Contact:
Re: Barrel length
I have studied this at the bench with chrono and in the field. My conclusion from thousands of rounds fired is with 39&40 grain bullets you gain very little with longer than 24 inch barrel and also very little, if any, gain from the last 1/2 grain of powder approaching maximum. An 11 twist 24 inch barrel produces a stable 39 grain bullet at well beyond 600 yards from loads with .3 to .5 under recommended max. By the way, the only reason to stop shooting your 204R at 600 yards is to bring out your 20BR and 32 grain bullets are for the 20VT.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:06 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: CZ-527, Remington 700 VLTHSS
Re: Barrel length
Hotshot...for everything I have but the 204, I agree. But the 204's...mine prefer the upper load range. Dunno' why.
- Hotshot
- Senior Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:32 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savage and ar-15
- Location: Rapid City
- Contact:
Re: Barrel length
JW,
A few years back I would have agreed with you whole heartedly. 4 years ago while helping a friend develop loads for his new rifle we sat down with the chrony and started working up to the max load. I think we were using Benchmark but that really doesn't matter. In .2 increments we only gained 27 fps for the last grain we used. When my friend looked at me and asked why he should add that last grain I didn't have a good answer. He never did and has loved the performance of that rifle. Since then I always drop back .3 to .5 from max and the more I shoot my 204's the better I get with them. To each his own, this opinion is worth every penny you paid for it.
Mark
A few years back I would have agreed with you whole heartedly. 4 years ago while helping a friend develop loads for his new rifle we sat down with the chrony and started working up to the max load. I think we were using Benchmark but that really doesn't matter. In .2 increments we only gained 27 fps for the last grain we used. When my friend looked at me and asked why he should add that last grain I didn't have a good answer. He never did and has loved the performance of that rifle. Since then I always drop back .3 to .5 from max and the more I shoot my 204's the better I get with them. To each his own, this opinion is worth every penny you paid for it.
Mark
- Flatliner
- New Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:35 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: none
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: Barrel length
Thanks for the info guys.
Excellent link, Rick................ I really should have read it the first time you posted. My apologies.Rick in Oregon wrote:Flatliner: This may help answer your 204 barrel length/velocity question:
http://www.bullberry.com/204_ruger_velocities.html
HTH
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:06 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: CZ-527, Remington 700 VLTHSS
Re: Barrel length
I follow you exactly and I would do the same especially if the accuracy is still there. Another thing I've learned is [IMO]; in the big scheme of things an extra 100 fps doesn't always buy you that much more shooting distance. Oh...it helps and sounds nice but its not the end all-to be-all.Hotshot wrote:JW,
A few years back I would have agreed with you whole heartedly. 4 years ago while helping a friend develop loads for his new rifle we sat down with the chrony and started working up to the max load. I think we were using Benchmark but that really doesn't matter. In .2 increments we only gained 27 fps for the last grain we used. When my friend looked at me and asked why he should add that last grain I didn't have a good answer. He never did and has loved the performance of that rifle. Since then I always drop back .3 to .5 from max and the more I shoot my 204's the better I get with them. To each his own, this opinion is worth every penny you paid for it.
Mark
- Blacklab
- New Member
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 4:16 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: lilja 17 1-12 T ar 15
- Location: Wa st
Re: Barrel length
Thanks for the link Rick.Rick in Oregon wrote:All four of my 204's along with my 20VT all wear 24" barrels. Matter of fact, ALL my varmint rifles wear that length, as I find that particular length the best (IMO) for the combination of handling in the field, on the bench and velocity. Anything longer gets too muzzle heavy and clunky, shorter gives too much blast and velocity loss, but it's purty subjective at best.
You may find this piece interesting to make your decision:
http://www.bullberry.com/204_ruger_velocities.html
I'm just getting into the Ruger 204 in AR platforum. My velocities an moa suck Using a new lilja 1-12 17 inch barrel and factory hornady v-max my velocities are 3500 - 3600. Your link shows I'm 200 to 300 fps short fps which answers a lot of questions. Thanks now I have a better idea on where to go "SLOWLY".
Hey, I'm not a complete idiot. I have parts missing.