Question----

General discussion and information about the 204 Ruger.
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Question----

Post by my204custom »

has anyone used the Nikon range finder? If so what do u think? that or a regular scope?

nikon Laser IRT ranger finding scope
User avatar
ryutzy
Senior Member
Posts: 563
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:40 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Superior Arms Custom AR-15 Leopold VXIII 4.5-14X50
Location: Plain City, OH

Re: Question----

Post by ryutzy »

I have not used a Nikon Rangefinder, but one of my good friends has. I have the Leopold RX 1000 TBR and love it!! My friend took his Nikon back and bought one identical to mine. I think it all depends on what exactly you want to use it for. I needed one with the TBR and a bow function as I do a lot of bow hunting. The leopold has served me well from long range rifle in the mountains to short range bow shots. I would definitely buy another. I dont know anything about the scope you mentioned.
It's hard to detect good luck, It looks so much like something you've worked hard for and earned.
Stay humble, Stay teacheable
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Re: Question----

Post by my204custom »

i have a nikon Monarch 5.5x16.5x44 i was going to put on my 204 an I saw this in the store an i was if it cut all my guess work out that be easy -- but i am building a 22-250 an looking for a nice scope-- i was going to spend 1000$ for a scope---- just not sure what one-- i like to see my prey i am killing--
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Re: Question----

Post by my204custom »

it is a scope it has the range finder built in it-it takes the guess work out-- it is not a hand held one this one goes on your gun---
User avatar
futuretrades
Senior Member
Posts: 835
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:16 am
.204 Ruger Guns: HOWA 1500 .204 Ruger Varmint, Bull Bbl, Lupy 6-18x40 custom

Re: Question----

Post by futuretrades »

my204custom wrote:i was going to spend 1000$ for a scope---- just not sure what one--
IMHO; If you are willing to spend $1000.00 on a scope, get a Leupold in a VX-3. Lots of good choices, and the optics are wonderful.
NRA Benefactor Life member
HOWA 1500 Varmint 204 Ruger, Bull Barrel, Hogue Overmold Stock, Leupold VXII 6-18x40mm AO LRV Custom Reticle Timney Trigger
Cooper Mdl 21 20VarTargW/Leupold VXIII, 6-20x40AO Varmint Hunter reticle.
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Re: Question----

Post by my204custom »

i just spent 3k on the gun-- had the stock made then pac nor did the barrel an got a Remington short action an built a 204 i got a nikon Monarch 5.5 x 16.5 x 40 just like something lil more-- i will look at them-- my dad has ziess on his guns but lil out of my range---
greenmonster204
New Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:03 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: custom side-bolt ar-15, rem 700 vtr, rem 700 spc

Re: Question----

Post by greenmonster204 »

i work in a retail store and have played with many rangefinders. i dont like the read-out on the nikons, to me it is hard to see. i really like the leuopold rx-1000/ 1000tbr also. in the 300-400 dollar price range i would choose the 1000tbr. if you wanna spend a little more leica's new 1600 is the nicest rangefinder ive seen yet. awsome read-outs, easy to read, great range capability, and small and compact, but its in the 900 dollar range.
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Re: Question----

Post by my204custom »

Nikon Laser IRT Matte 4-12 X 42mm BDC Riflescope cut in copy that--- that is what i was looking at-- not just a regular range finder-- so what do u think of that one?
Wrangler John
Senior Member
Posts: 306
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:05 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Savage Precision Target/Shilen Custom

Re: Question----

Post by Wrangler John »

One thing I learned about Nikon scopes is that they just don't compare favorably to just about any other similarly priced product. I purchased two Nikon's, the last of which was a 6-24x 50 SF Monarch purchased last year. It lost its ability to hold zero, and was so blurry that I sent it back for service. When it returned it will hold zero, but the picture quality is really sub-par. Low contrast and poor sharpness is the rule of both Monarchs I own. This week at a range session I struggled to see the target with the Monarch. When I switched to a second rifle with a Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24x I was startled by the clarity, contrast and sharpness. Same with the Clearidge scope, Leupolds and Burris scopes. I will not purchase another Nikon. I also avoid side focus scopes with 1" tubes, they seem to reduce the amount of available light through the erector tube, but the 30mm tubes are much better.
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Re: Question----

Post by my204custom »

that is what i hear also--- thank you-- so what u saying dont get one--- i just like the BDC how that is-- but i guess i will go to what i had in mind in the first place-- was a Leopold scope-- u cant go wrong there-- my brother also said the Bushnell Elite is a good one to get also--there just so many options out there--I just want all my guns to look the same but different calibers --- I have a nice Volquartsen 22 then i have the Savage 17hmr an had a nice custom stock made for it then i haev the 204 an just bought an action last week from Darrel holland to build a 22-250--
User avatar
RoadKill
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Rem. 700VLS and 23" G2 barrel on older Contender
Location: Caswell County bush in NC

Re: Question----

Post by RoadKill »

I just bought a Nikon Monarch 4-16x50 and Leupold QRW rings for swapping in less power when critter splattin. For paper poking I have an older Vari-X III 6.5-20x40AO which has too often been too much for the closer live candidates. Many of the customer reviews I read had the Monarch optics right there with the mid-range Leupold but I ain’t seeing that from mine with just a hand held look out the window. It may do well enough on the gun but as usual every time I’ve gone cheap I’ve wished I had saved the money for another Leupold.
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Re: Question----

Post by my204custom »

i have a 5.5 x 15.5 x 44 nikon monarch i bought off here long time ago for few hundred dollars--i dont have no high end scopes my dad has a millet just sitting at the house is big scope it is a 6x25x56 it is big I think that may be good enough for a 22-250---
Jim White
Moderator
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:06 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: CZ-527, Remington 700 VLTHSS

Re: Question----

Post by Jim White »

Wrangler John wrote:One thing I learned about Nikon scopes is that they just don't compare favorably to just about any other similarly priced product. I purchased two Nikon's, the last of which was a 6-24x 50 SF Monarch purchased last year. It lost its ability to hold zero, and was so blurry that I sent it back for service. When it returned it will hold zero, but the picture quality is really sub-par. Low contrast and poor sharpness is the rule of both Monarchs I own. This week at a range session I struggled to see the target with the Monarch. When I switched to a second rifle with a Bushnell Elite 4200 6-24x I was startled by the clarity, contrast and sharpness. Same with the Clearidge scope, Leupolds and Burris scopes. I will not purchase another Nikon. I also avoid side focus scopes with 1" tubes, they seem to reduce the amount of available light through the erector tube, but the 30mm tubes are much better.
Your experience is similar to mine. I had the old style Monarch (6.5-20x44 w/AO) and I feel it was a better scope optically than the it's replacement 6-24x50 w/SF. As I've said many times, the 6-24 pars just as good with my 8-25 Leupold VX-3 until about 18x which is where it starts to get fuzzy/hazy etc... In daylight, under 18x, it's as good as my Leupold, Zeiss and Swarvoski on my varmint guns. Maybe it's something to do with the side focus because there is an extra piece of glass that goes along with S/F vice A/O. I'll admit though, the new Monarchs have nice looking aesthetics, IMO. Just wish I could use the full range of the optics.

On one of my 17 HMR's I have the older style 4.5-14x40 w/AO Buckmaster. I like it much better than it's replacement w/side focus. It's not as bright in low light conditions as the S/F model but it does have a better FOV and for rats, I shoot those in broad daylight anyway.
my204custom
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 10:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Pac-Nor 204 custom

Re: Question----

Post by my204custom »

true that is all i shoot in the day away ways-- my dad has Zeiss an schmit in bender on his guns-- i just need to step up an get a nice scope-- i have 3k into my 204 an to put a junk scope on it i dont think it would do it justice--- Right---
bigcatdaddy
New Member
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:38 am
.204 Ruger Guns: savage

Re: Question----

Post by bigcatdaddy »

you might be suprised by the quality of the Busnell Elite
Post Reply