Is it my amagination or dose it take less effort to clean your barrel using BL-C(2) over RL-10X? I had been shooting 32vmax with RL-10X and yesterday went out shooting 35 Bergers with BL-C(2) and when I went to clean my gun it just seemed to take less time to get a clean patch. If this is the case then mabe I should look into finding a new load for my 32vmaxes. Just a oberservation question for y'all
thanks Ulen MN
BL-C(2) vs RL-10X
- ulen mn
- Junior Member
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:57 am
- .204 Ruger Guns: CZ 527 Varmint
- Location: Ulen Minn.
BL-C(2) vs RL-10X
Rick AKA Ulen MN
NRA Life Member
NRA Life Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:34 am
- .204 Ruger Guns: Remington XR-100 / Savage-Douglas-Richards
Re: BL-C(2) vs RL-10X
My results comparing BL-C(2) with 10x and 15 would confirm what you are seeing. But 10x and 15 shoot so good in my rifles that it's hard not to use them.
- Glen
- Moderator
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:22 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Rem700ADL
- Location: New Philadelphia, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: BL-C(2) vs RL-10X
I noticed the same thing. The BLC(2) wouldn't push over 3800fps tho if I remember correctly.
Friends Are Friends By Nature.
RIP Russ,Blaine, & Darrell!!
I don't like repeat offenders. I like DEAD offenders!!
Ted Nugent
Isn't there a minimum age for grampas??
^^^^^^
Audrey Renae told me "No there isn't"!!
Glen
RIP Russ,Blaine, & Darrell!!
I don't like repeat offenders. I like DEAD offenders!!
Ted Nugent
Isn't there a minimum age for grampas??
^^^^^^
Audrey Renae told me "No there isn't"!!
Glen