BL-C(2) vs RL-10X

General discussion and information about the 204 Ruger.
User avatar
ulen mn
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:57 am
.204 Ruger Guns: CZ 527 Varmint
Location: Ulen Minn.

BL-C(2) vs RL-10X

Post by ulen mn »

Is it my amagination or dose it take less effort to clean your barrel using BL-C(2) over RL-10X? I had been shooting 32vmax with RL-10X and yesterday went out shooting 35 Bergers with BL-C(2) and when I went to clean my gun it just seemed to take less time to get a clean patch. :chin: If this is the case then mabe I should look into finding a new load for my 32vmaxes. Just a oberservation question for y'all

thanks Ulen MN
Rick AKA Ulen MN
NRA Life Member
WrzWaldo
Senior Member
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:34 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Remington XR-100 / Savage-Douglas-Richards

Re: BL-C(2) vs RL-10X

Post by WrzWaldo »

My results comparing BL-C(2) with 10x and 15 would confirm what you are seeing. But 10x and 15 shoot so good in my rifles that it's hard not to use them.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 9:22 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Rem700ADL
Location: New Philadelphia, Ohio
Contact:

Re: BL-C(2) vs RL-10X

Post by Glen »

I noticed the same thing. The BLC(2) wouldn't push over 3800fps tho if I remember correctly. :chin:
Friends Are Friends By Nature.

RIP Russ,Blaine, & Darrell!!

I don't like repeat offenders. I like DEAD offenders!!
Ted Nugent


Isn't there a minimum age for grampas??
^^^^^^
Audrey Renae told me "No there isn't"!!

Glen
Post Reply