Page 1 of 1
Is there much difference?
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:21 am
by Jersey Hunter
Is there much difference in clarity, brightness, for hunting between these scopes. None of the sporting stores in my area carry enough a selection to compare.
Weaver grand slam
Bushnell elite 4200
Nikon buck master
Thanks,
Re: Is there much difference?
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:49 am
by Hotshot
You've picked 3 good ones. When I can't go with a Leupold VXIII, I go bushnell Elite.
Re: Is there much difference?
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:46 am
by nevadamatt
I have a nikon buckmaster 4.5 to 14x40 and i love it! I have bought another one for another rifle and would say for the price its the best glass one could get.the bdc is nice but the other i got did not have it and its nice to. good luck
Re: Is there much difference?
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:35 pm
by acloco
Personally, I think the Nikon anything scopes that say x40 should indicat that it is actually x32 or less. Clarity is good, expecially for the price, but the x32 mm actual objective size and the wide line reticles have turned me off of them.
The Elite is the top scope you listed, by far.
Re: Is there much difference?
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:30 am
by Jersey Hunter
Thanks for the replies I went with the elite 4200.