Is there much difference in clarity, brightness, for hunting between these scopes. None of the sporting stores in my area carry enough a selection to compare.
Weaver grand slam
Bushnell elite 4200
Nikon buck master
Thanks,
Is there much difference?
-
- New Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:22 pm
- Location: New Jersey
- Hotshot
- Senior Member
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:32 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: Savage and ar-15
- Location: Rapid City
- Contact:
Re: Is there much difference?
You've picked 3 good ones. When I can't go with a Leupold VXIII, I go bushnell Elite.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:52 am
- .204 Ruger Guns: rem 700 adl
Re: Is there much difference?
I have a nikon buckmaster 4.5 to 14x40 and i love it! I have bought another one for another rifle and would say for the price its the best glass one could get.the bdc is nice but the other i got did not have it and its nice to. good luck
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:53 pm
- .204 Ruger Guns: 12FV, 12BVSS -S
- Location: Nebraska
Re: Is there much difference?
Personally, I think the Nikon anything scopes that say x40 should indicat that it is actually x32 or less. Clarity is good, expecially for the price, but the x32 mm actual objective size and the wide line reticles have turned me off of them.
The Elite is the top scope you listed, by far.
The Elite is the top scope you listed, by far.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:22 pm
- Location: New Jersey