Is there much difference?

Discussion about rifle scopes, spotting scopes and binoculars.
Jersey Hunter
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: New Jersey

Is there much difference?

Post by Jersey Hunter »

Is there much difference in clarity, brightness, for hunting between these scopes. None of the sporting stores in my area carry enough a selection to compare.
Weaver grand slam
Bushnell elite 4200
Nikon buck master


Thanks,
Barry
User avatar
Hotshot
Senior Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:32 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Savage and ar-15
Location: Rapid City
Contact:

Re: Is there much difference?

Post by Hotshot »

You've picked 3 good ones. When I can't go with a Leupold VXIII, I go bushnell Elite.
nevadamatt
New Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:52 am
.204 Ruger Guns: rem 700 adl

Re: Is there much difference?

Post by nevadamatt »

I have a nikon buckmaster 4.5 to 14x40 and i love it! I have bought another one for another rifle and would say for the price its the best glass one could get.the bdc is nice but the other i got did not have it and its nice to. good luck
acloco
Senior Member
Posts: 1708
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:53 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: 12FV, 12BVSS -S
Location: Nebraska

Re: Is there much difference?

Post by acloco »

Personally, I think the Nikon anything scopes that say x40 should indicat that it is actually x32 or less. Clarity is good, expecially for the price, but the x32 mm actual objective size and the wide line reticles have turned me off of them.

The Elite is the top scope you listed, by far.
Jersey Hunter
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Is there much difference?

Post by Jersey Hunter »

Thanks for the replies I went with the elite 4200.
Barry
Post Reply