New cartridge question
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:46 pm
Hello:
Question primarily for those who have been involved with the 204 Ruger since her introduction. I was curious how the process of releasing load data progressed? I had it easy as I only have been working with the 204 ruger for less than a year.
Presently the 17 fireball has been competing with the 204 for my attention. I find it a little surprising as to how slow information has been released. The lack of cartridge dimensions comes as the biggest surprise to me. Looks like the 17 FB will take a back seat to the 204 in most every respect. Still the highly efficient cartridge shoots well within the right wind and distance parameters.
The 17 FB cartridge dimensions are slightly different from the 17 Mach 4 wildcat. Seems as the only notable difference between the 17 FB and the 17 Mach IV is the length of the neck. I have been working with the 17 FB for less than 2 weeks and am bothered by the question of determining the correct OAL for the brass.
Hodgdon has released load data for the 17 FB and I am happy to see that they have not been overly conservative with the load data. One thing I do question is the 1.4" cartridge length called for, as the factory ammo I have worked with yields brass with a length that ranges between 1.405" to 1.420"
Would someone wish to help a guy determine an optimal length one may trim the 17 FB brass to?
Thanks,
Hunterapp
Question primarily for those who have been involved with the 204 Ruger since her introduction. I was curious how the process of releasing load data progressed? I had it easy as I only have been working with the 204 ruger for less than a year.
Presently the 17 fireball has been competing with the 204 for my attention. I find it a little surprising as to how slow information has been released. The lack of cartridge dimensions comes as the biggest surprise to me. Looks like the 17 FB will take a back seat to the 204 in most every respect. Still the highly efficient cartridge shoots well within the right wind and distance parameters.
The 17 FB cartridge dimensions are slightly different from the 17 Mach 4 wildcat. Seems as the only notable difference between the 17 FB and the 17 Mach IV is the length of the neck. I have been working with the 17 FB for less than 2 weeks and am bothered by the question of determining the correct OAL for the brass.
Hodgdon has released load data for the 17 FB and I am happy to see that they have not been overly conservative with the load data. One thing I do question is the 1.4" cartridge length called for, as the factory ammo I have worked with yields brass with a length that ranges between 1.405" to 1.420"
Would someone wish to help a guy determine an optimal length one may trim the 17 FB brass to?
Thanks,
Hunterapp