IMR4895 vs H4895

Ask questions and share information about reloading.
Post Reply
TD-Max
Senior Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:13 pm
Location: Central WI

IMR4895 vs H4895

Post by TD-Max »

Is ther any REAL difference? I see they are grouped together as to burn rate. Hodgdon groups theirs with their Extreme powders so I'd lean that way.

Load data interchangeable?
Sako VLSS Set Trigger in .204 with Leupold VXIII 4.5-14x50 LR
Sako VLSS Set Trigger in 22-250 with Swaro Z5 5-25x52 BRX and turret
Sako Stainless Synth in .260 with Swaro Z5 3.5-18x44 BRX
Ruger MKIII 678GC with Ultradot Matchdot
Top
User avatar
ACLakey
Senior Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:06 pm
.204 Ruger Guns: Savage .204 Predator Hunter(soon)
Location: So. Oregon

Re: IMR4895 vs H4895

Post by ACLakey »

From my experience, no the H4895 has been a little hotter.
Top
User avatar
Sidewinderwa
Senior Member
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 9:39 am
.204 Ruger Guns: Savages
Location: Washington state

Re: IMR4895 vs H4895

Post by Sidewinderwa »

I shoot the H4895 because it is a temperature insensitive powder. Most of the shooters use the H over the IMR, that I have seen.
Image
Please, no Sidewinder today!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Reloading”