SmallCaliberCentral

I have had bad luck with Nikon. And I did not have a good luck with their customer service. I bought a monarch that was bad right out of the box, the windage would not adjust. It was 2 months before I was able to take it out and try and sight it in. Bottom line was SWFA took it back them selves, and...

PM sent

Yeeeeeeeeeee Haaaaaaaaaaw! love that video, can't quit watching it. I must have seen it 100 times, and it still hasn't got old. thanks.

I have a slightly modified DPMS Lr204 and love it. Still working loads up for it, but so far it shoots everything well.

sick1: Nice write up there, bud. I'd like to comment, even though I'm a dedicated/documented Leupold user.... 1. Considering how hard I know it is to shoot a digital image through a scope, I think you did a great job. 2. Even though we all know what the camera sees is much different from what our e...

Wow..interesting. One other item - notice the difference in the amount of fence that you see on the same/nearly the same power settings? I wish you had a Nikko Stirling 6-24x56 as the 4th scope.... On the amount of fence shown in retical views, just depended on the height of the gun, bipod and scop...

First off, sorry about the spelling, I'm a retard with out spell check. Here is a brief, non professional, review of 3 high power scopes: Top- Leupold Vari X III 8.5x25x50 on a semi custom DPMS AR15 in .204 Middle- Pentax Lightseeker 30 8.5x32x50 on a semi custom Remington 700 in .223 Bottom- Nightf...

Hello everyone, joined a few weeks ago, and this is my first post. I just picked one up of these Pentax scopes for a "beater" build (700 Rem .223). BIG scope, seems to be over built. Nice positive clicks on the target turrets. Daytime image is clear, I will take it out tonight and compare ...